Twitter v. Musk — Redacted Exhibits A–J (Discovery Letters, 2022)
| Author | Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; et al. (court filing) |
|---|---|
| Published | September 29, 2022 |
| Format | Reference |
TL;DR — Redacted exhibits filed in Delaware Chancery in Twitter v. Musk (2022): lawyers’ letters fighting over gaps in Musk’s and Jared Birchall’s text-message production.
E-filed 29 September 2022 in Twitter, Inc. v. Elon R. Musk et al., C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM, before Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick. The exhibits are mostly discovery correspondence from August and September 2022 between Twitter’s counsel (Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz) and Musk’s (Quinn Emanuel), plus related court orders.
The first letter (30 August 2022) complains that the defendants’ production has gaps at critical moments — very few texts from Musk around 6–11 May, when he was said to be reconsidering the deal, none from a week around 4 June, and none between Musk and Birchall in early May. Later exhibits continue the dispute over interrogatories and custodians.
What it is: a public court filing (redacted), a primary legal record of the discovery fight before Musk agreed to close the deal in October 2022. No official open copy was located.
Where this came from
- A copy saved in October 2026.
151 pages. A PDF copy is held in Kyle’s private archive; it is not linked or shared here.