Elon Musk Discreetly Bought a $1 Billion Gas Turbine Company to Power AI. Here's What it Means for SpaceX Investors.
Elon Musk Discreetly Bought a $1 Billion Gas Turbine Company to Power AI. Here’s What it Means for SpaceX Investors.
Author: John Bromels URL: https://www.fool.com/investing/2026/07/15/elon-musk-discreetly-bought-a-1-billion-gas-turbine-company-to-power-ai-heres-what-it-means-for-spacex-investors/ One-line: Despite SpaceX’s S-1 prospectus repeatedly framing solar as the only truly scalable energy source for AI, the company’s Colossus II data center runs on natural gas — and Elon Musk just made a quiet billion-dollar bet on gas turbine supplier APR Energy.
Key claims
- SpaceX’s S-1 prospectus praises solar rhetorically but the company doesn’t harness it outside space. The prospectus states the sun “contains approximately 99.8% of the solar system’s energy” and calls it “the only truly scalable solution to terrestrial energy constraints in the age of AI” — repeating the claim five more times — yet SpaceX’s Colossus II data center on the Tennessee/Mississippi border is expected to run on natural gas “for the foreseeable future.”
- SpaceX significantly relies on natural gas and gas turbines to power its data centers, per its own prospectus language, and says its ability to scale “depends in part” on continued natural gas access and gas turbine availability.
- Musk/SpaceX quietly acquired Jacksonville-based APR Energy for roughly $1 billion — a supplier of small, trailer-mounted gas turbines and diesel engines — rather than an existing gas power plant near Colossus II.
- The mobile units let SpaceX sidestep lengthy permitting. SpaceX classifies the units as temporary mobile equipment exempt from Mississippi’s air-permitting rules; the Southern Environmental Law Center and Earthjustice sued in June, arguing units that never leave aren’t really “temporary.”
- 59 units are installed to date, which could collectively emit 2,500 tons of nitrogen oxide per year, even though each individual unit’s output falls under the Clean Air Act’s 100-ton threshold for unpermitted turbines.
- National-security arguments are shielding the units from the lawsuit in the near term — the DOJ and Department of Defense have argued against shutting the units down, citing Grok’s use by the military, meaning the mobile units are likely to remain at least through the current administration.
- The move undercuts SpaceX’s own solar-dominance thesis for the $26.5 trillion AI market — if solar were truly the company’s ticket to dominating AI energy demand, the author argues investors would expect to see SpaceX investing in it now rather than betting on gas.
Notable quotes
“The Sun contains approximately 99.8% of the solar system’s energy and, as a result, we believe it is the only truly scalable solution to terrestrial energy constraints in the age of AI.”
“SpaceX’s prospectus notes that it ‘significantly’ relies ‘on natural gas and gas turbine technology to power our data center operations.’”
“Because these are small, mobile units, they can often be installed within days without the lengthy siting and permitting process required for a permanent power plant.”
“It’s another sign that investors may have to wait a long time for SpaceX to grow into its current $1.8 trillion valuation.”
How it connects
- SpaceX — subject; the gas-vs-solar contradiction sits inside SpaceX’s post-IPO energy strategy for its AI data centers.
- Elon Musk — the acquisition (APR Energy) was made on SpaceX’s behalf under his leadership.
- Tesla — referenced as Musk’s prior solar/renewable-energy vehicle (SolarCity acquisition, solar roof), the contrast the piece leans on.
Referenced in
- Elon Musk note